Now that you have completed the activities and the discussion for Module 3, you are ready to do Assignment 3.
This assignment is out of 100 marks and is worth 15 per cent of your final course grade.
The assignment has two sections:
Section A: Short Critical Reflections (30 marks)
Section B: Essay (70 marks)
Details of each section follow.
Section A: Short Critical Reflections (30 marks)
Select one of the assigned readings in each topic in Module 3 and write a short critical reflection (about 250 words) for each (a total of three critical reflections; ten marks for each reflection). You may find it helpful to use one or more of the focus questions included in the activity as a guide.
The critical reflection should present your own thoughts and responses to the reading. Thus, it is an interaction between the ideas in the reading and your own interpretation and response to what you have read. The critical reflection is a polished piece of writing that will be assessed using the same criteria as any piece of writing. It should include an introduction, a body that presents your thoughts clearly and logically, and a conclusion. You may write in the first person but be sure to refer to some of the ideas that are introduced in the reading.
Section B: Essay (70 marks)
Now that you have a general understanding of the observed and potential impacts of climate change in British Columbia, write an essay of 7501000 words on how you think an altered climate may change peoples lifestyle expectations and attitudes in BC. This requires giving further thought to the potential impacts of climate change that you examined throughout the module and evaluating the significance of those impacts. For example, how might a changed climate affect where people locate, insurance policies, health issues, and so on? And which factors may limit or strengthen peoples and/or communities ability to adapt to climate change?
You must reference the course resources that you use in your paper. You are encouraged to use additional references, but they are not required for this assignment. A strong paper will consider the implications of three potential impacts.
If you have any questions about the assignment, consult your course tutor. When you have completed the assignment, send it to your Open Learning Faculty Member for comments and evaluation.
Refer to Assignment Instructions section under the “Assignments Overview” tab for details of the criteria for how the assignments are evaluated.
Here is the criteria for how the assignments will be evaluated. Details of the individual assignments are provided with each assignment.
Criteria for Evaluating Assignments
The following criteria will be used to evaluate the essay portion of the written assignments.
Substance (75 per cent)
The essay provides evidence of critical thinking and analysis as well as synthesis of researched information throughout and presents a logical and persuasive argument.
The essay incorporates concepts and associated terms on the science of climate change that were introduced in this module.
Research sources are relevant, current, and credible. They are clearly documented in the paper.
The introduction offers a sense of direction for the paper and presents a clear thesis statement to the reader.
The body develops the necessary aspects of the main idea and provides examples, support, or illustration for each aspect of the main idea.
The conclusion summarizes the main points and ties them to the thesis; it also presents an impact statement and/or suggests direction for future research.
Writing Style and Format (25 per cent)
Paragraphs are unified, developed, and coherent, with transitions between ideas.
Sentences are grammatically correct; words are chosen for accuracy and impact.
The writing follows the conventions of spelling and mechanics (punctuation, etc.).
The format follows the APA documentation style accurately and consistently.
How Assignments Are Marked
Some students believe they start with 100 marks on a given assignment and lose a mark for each mistake. This is not true. An assignment is judged not only on how well a student avoids grievous errors, but also on what original and worthwhile content and expression a student brings to the assignment. In marking your work for this course, your Open Learning Faculty Member will assess your ability to analyze the essay topic and develop and present a logical, persuasive, and insightful argument that is well supported by citing relevant, current, and credible sources. Your essay also demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of the material covered in the course module, and your writing is clear, concise, and grammatically correct and includes proper format and citations. A first-class, or A, paper (80100 per cent) will meet this criteria, and all lesser grades miss at least one of the ingredients just described.
The following guidelines may help you set standards for your assignments and interpret the marks you receive for them.
80% and above:
A first-class paper (A+/A/A-) exhibits excellence in style, demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of the course material, and provides evidence of critical thinking and analysis as well as synthesis of well-researched information throughout. It shows originality and insightfulness, and is written in clear, fluent, and technically correct prose. References are properly and consistently cited and recorded using APA Style.
A second-class paper (B+/B/B-) represents solid, above-average competence and achievement. In an essay of this quality, the ideas are sound, convincingly substantiated, and show some originality; in an otherwise strong discussion, expression might be inconsistent, incomplete in the use of evidence, or display minor weaknesses in style.
A paper at this level (C+/C/C-) is of average competence and demonstrates a satisfactory but incomplete grasp of course and/or research material; ideas might not be fully developed or might tend toward vagueness, or the argument might exhibit problems in expression, organization, style, or mechanics.
A paper at this level (D range) indicates a weak or barely adequate understanding and use of the course and research material; organization and substantiation of argument might be deficient, or the discussion might be flawed by basic writing errors or problems in expression. A grade at this level warns that more energy and effort are needed.
A grade at this level is a fail and indicates that the assignment is unsatisfactory either in content or expression (or both) and that it does not demonstrate a satisfactory understanding of the course material. However, a student who fails a first assignment should not abandon the course. The Open Learning Faculty Members comments should be read carefully. Please feel free to contact your Open Learning Faculty Member if you have any questions. At this point, the student may wish to continue, or may choose to switch to a course more appropriate to his or her present level.
The following criteria will be used to evaluate the short critical reflections submitted as part of the written assignments:
The critical reflection includes a succinct summary of the required reading and demonstrates an understanding of the key points in the reading.
The critical reflection also includes a thoughtful, insightful commentary in response to what was read. The commentary demonstrates an engagement with the reading and is the interaction between the ideas in the reading and the students own interpretation/response.
The critical reflection is a polished piece of writing, written in clear, fluent, and technically correct prose. (Note that the writing is less formal than an essay, so you may write in the first person.)